|
ON
THIS PAGE
The
Birth of Jesus Christ
The
Shepherds come
The
Three Wise Men
Mother
and child
Extra
Websites






Paintings
by
Albrecht
Altdorfer
Federico
Barocci
Bruegel
Hendrik
ter Brugghen
Duccio
di Buoninsegna
Caravaggio
Petrus Christus
Correggio
Lorenzo
Costa
Jacques
Darat
Gerard
David
Gentile
da Fabriano
Piero della
Francesco
Gauguin
Jans
tot Sint Geertgen
Georgione
Ghirlandaio
Giotto
El
Greco
Matthias
Grünewald
Honthurst
di
Georgio Martini
Michael
Pacher
Meister
der Palermo
Rubens
Conrad
von Soest
James
Tissot
George
de la Tour
Leonardo da Vinci
Martin
de Vos
|
'In the
Roman world there were special birthing chairs with a U-shaped
hole in the seat and supports for the feet and back, but we have
no way of knowing whether this medical technology had reached
provincial towns in Israel...'
Childbirth
in Mary's time
|
|
'What did Mary look
like? Shorter than modern people, about five feet tall for
women and a bit more for men. Robust, sturdy, with strong brown
hands callused from work, and glossy black hair.
Peasant women often painted a line of red or purple dye down the
center of their hair, and wore modest pieces of jewelry...'
The
Real Mary
|
|
'Something
unexpected happened. Mary became pregnant, and there seemed no
obvious explanation. She was a virtuous girl without any
previous hint of scandal, so Joseph was perplexed. There must be
a father, but he knew it wasn't him...'
Joseph's
Story
|
|
'In summer the
windows were covered with a lattice cover; in winter with thick
woolen matting. This kept the house cool in summer and warm in
winter...'
An
Ancient Village
|
|
Prayer for a New
Mother
'Keep from her dreams the
rumble of a crowd,
The smell of rough-cut
wood, the trail of red,
The thick and chilly
whiteness of the shroud
That wraps the strange new
body of the dead.'
Read more..
|
'And
she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in bands of cloth,
and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the
inn.'
Luke's Gospel
Read more...
|
|
'Both women
and men wore a loincloth, the equivalent of underpants. This was
a long thin strip of cloth which was wound around the waist and
then between the legs, with the end tucked in at the waist.
Women wore some sort of binding around their
breasts...'
Women's
Clothing
|
|
The
Birth of Jesus
Hidden
meaning in the story of the Birth
of Jesus
-
Only Matthew and Luke describe Christ's
birth, and they do so quite briefly. Never mind - people in
the Middle Ages filled out the story.
-
Luke
mentions a house and a manger. But in the
apocryphal Book of James 'Joseph found a cave there and brought her into it ... And behold a bright cloud overshadowing the cave ... The cloud withdrew itself out of the cave and a great light appeared in the cave so that our eyes could not endure it. And
little by little that light withdrew itself until the young child appeared: and it went and took the breast of its mother Mary.'
-
The apocryphal Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
first mentions the ox and ass. 'On the third day Mary left the cave and went to a stable and put the child in the manger, and the ox and ass adored him.'
-
The
familiar image of the Virgin kneeling in adoration followed the account by St Bridget of Sweden who visited Bethlehem in 1370 and wrote in her Revelations of her vision of the
Virgin 'when her time came she took off her shoes and her white cloak and undid her veil, letting her golden hair fall on her shoulders. Then she made ready the swaddling clothes,
bent her knees and began to pray. While she was thus praying with hands raised the child was suddenly born, surrounded by a light so bright that it completely eclipsed Joseph's feeble candle.'
-
Byzantine artists showed an actual confinement with the Virgin
lying on a bed and two midwives in attendance. The apocryphal Book of James relates that one of the midwives, Mary Salome denied that Mary could have given birth and still remain a virgin intact, and examined her for proof. Her arm shrivelled on touching Mary, but was made whole again when she picked up the child. This
theme disappeared altogether after itwas condemned by the Council of Trent in the mid-16th century.
-
Another account
in the 14th century by Pseudo-Bonaventura says: 'The Virgin arose in the night and leaned against a pillar. Joseph brought into the stable a bundle of hay which he threw down and the Son of God, issuing from his mother's belly without causing her pain, was projected instantly on to the hay at the Virgin's feet.'
|
|
The
Nativity, Conrad
von Soest, 1403

|
|
The stable's roof may be in
disrepair, but Mary's clothing is not. Nor is she cold - Joseph is
blowing on a little fire, either to warm the room or prepare some food
for her - probably both. Her look of utter tenderness is homely and
realistic, and the baby turns its little head towards her.
(Right)
Another painting by Conrad von Soest, this one of the death of Mary,
the mother of Jesus. It is surprisingly explicit, at least to modern
eyes. Mary's hands are already blue, as a dying person's extremities
will register the onset of death before any other part of the body. Two
angels tenderly close her eyes and mouth. John the Beloved Disciple
stands faithfully by her, in place of the Son she has lost.
(Left)
The painting of the death of Mary in situ, in the
Marienkirche in Dortmund.
|
|
Gerard
David, circa 1510

|
|
Art critics have called Gerard David's paintings conservative, even
bland, and who am I to argue? But he paints the most wonderful angels -
glorious creatures, truly celestial. See their
exquisite wings in his 'Annunciation' in the thumbnail
at right. If this
is 'conservative', give me more. Bruges,
as the headquarters of Netherlands art, was losing its importance to
Antwerp when this painting was done. David was the dean of the painters'
guild, and also the last great master from
this town. His paintings, beautiful as
they are, have a certain melancholy, a gentle sadness.
|
|
Michelangelo
Caravaggio, 1609

|
|
Caravaggio, of course, is
always original. His Mary is in disarray, and slumps back in exhaustion -
like
any woman who has just given birth. Joseph gazes unblinkingly at the
little form on the floor - new life, so full of promise. The
shepherds crowd around, talking among themselves. An angel hovers
overhead, holding the banner that proclaims 'Gloria in Excelsis Deo' -
Glory to God in the Highest.
|
|
The Virgin of the Veil, Aambrogio
Borgognone, 1500

|
|
The new Eve (Mary) has discarded the
half-rotten apple, symbol of Eve's disgrace. Her son will save the
world lost by Adam and Eve.
In the background, through a window,
sit two Carthusian monks pointing to the monastery that will house
this magnificent painting - the Certosa di Pavia in Lombardy. |
|
Adoration of the
Shepherds, George
de la Tour, 1644

|
|
De la Tour is
famous for his use of light, and of candlelight in particular, and now
he paints the Light of the World. The viewer stands in the darkened
background a little away from the quiet, reverent group. The faces of
these people show that they are aware of the significance of the newborn
child - their focus on his tiny swaddled figure is complete.
|
|
Artist
unknown,
circa 1100's

|
|
Miniature ivory plaque
showing Mary lying on a bed. It may have been part of a portable icon or
altar belonging to a royal or aristocratic family, carried around from
castle to castle. Most noble families had a portable altar which
traveled with them.
See also the ivory
tabernacle shown below. The
composition of the plaque is divided into two sections: a sleeping,
clearly exhausted Mary and some angels are on the
left, and Baby Jesus, Joseph and the animals are on the right. A homely
touch has Joseph rocking the pallet on which the baby lies - something
any parent will relate to.
|
|
Stained
glass window in St. Denis
Basilica, Paris; circa 1100

|
|
Mary lies resting on a
simple frame-bed, with the swaddled baby beside her. Joseph looks down on them
both. Angels perch, bird-like, above. All three are dressed or covered with blue, the color of heaven.
In a panel to the left of the main section an angel appears to the
shepherds; the section at right shows the Presentation in the
Temple.
Windows in medieval churches were used as teaching aids by the clergy,
since few people could read the Bible for
themselves.
|
|
Meister
der Palastkapelle, Palermo, 1150

|
|
Comment: Mary and Jesus are at the
center of this composite picture. Around them are
* the singing angels,
* the Three Wise Men,
* a perturbed Joseph awaking from his dream of danger,
* shepherds with
gifts,
* and at bottom right an image of Salome and the midwife. The
story of Salome who doubted the virginity of Mary, but became a
believer, was common in the Eastern Orthodox church. It appears in
several of the apocryphal gospels.
This ancient picture has
survived because it is a fresco made from colored glass and stone
fragments, usually on a high wall - and hence not subject to damp or
vandals.
Latin was always used for
church inscriptions, since it was a universal language understood by all
educated people of the time.
|
|
Alabaster
carved icon, faded coloring. Artist unknown, circa 1400

|
|
In this charming icon, Mary sleeps after the birth of Jesus.
Joseph watches over her with obvious and touching concern. There is a
homeliness, an intimacy about the figures that is unusual. The
Holy Family are shown here as normal people, with the emotions and needs
of an ordinary family.
|
|
Duccio
di Buoninsegna,
1308

|
|
This image of the Birth of
Christ was one panel from a huge altar piece originally in the cathedral
at Siena. It was placed there in 1311. In 1711, by now out of fashion,
it was sawn into pieces and distributed to separate locations. Some of
the original panels have been lost, but this one, of the birth of
Christ, gives some idea of blazing beauty of the sumptuous original.
|
|
Jans
tot Sint Geertgen, 1490

|
|
The faces of Mary and the
angels glow with light coming from the figure of the newborn Christ.
From the moment of his birth, Jesus is a source of radiant
enlightenment to the world.
Frankly, I find the
painting in the thumbnail at right more interesting. Mary, crowned with
roses (a 'rosary'?) holds the newborn Jesus in her arms. She crushes a
serpent/dragon under her foot, and seems encased in an egg-like ball of
light - 'clothed with the sun' as in Revelations 12. Around her, angels
swirl, some of them playing musical instruments, other holding the
implements of Jesus' Passion.
|
|
Petrus
Christus, 1445

|
|
The most flamboyant beings in this painting are the angels, gorgeously dressed
and with wings glowing with color. Heavenly creatures indeed. But poor
little Jesus, unclothed and with not even a cradle in which to lie. No
crib for his bed, indeed.
Petrus Christus was born at
the beginning of the fifteenth century at a village called Baerle in the
province of North Brabant. He settled in the city of Bruges in 1444 and
purchased his freedom of that city, becoming a master in the Guild of St
Luke.
He seems to have been the first Flemish easel-painter to
introduced items of everyday life into his paintings - something for
which Netherlands paintings would, in future centuries, become famous.
He was also a very skilled worker, and his technique alone would single
him out from among his contemporaries.
|
|
Lorenzo Costa,
1490

|
|
Lucky Lyon in France to have this picture in their gallery. The Madonna has the
facial delicacy which was a feature of Costa's paintings.
Am I alone in noting some similarity between this Madonna and the
women painted by Leonardo da Vinci?
Note the pose of the Infant Jesus; he is usually shown lying on his back
looking upwards at his mother. Discarding this formula, Costa has a
drowsy Infant looking outwards, towards the viewer. What a relaxed
little baby!
Joseph looks glum - or is it merely his drooping moustache that makes
him seem so?
|
|
Francesco di Giorgio
Martini,
1460

|
|
Manuscript
illumination, inset in capital letter probably at head of page.
The intricacy of these
hand-painted manuscript pages is astonishing -see the thumb-nail at
right,
taken from a Book of Hours produced in Belgium some time about 1450.
|
|
Albrecht Altdorfer,
1513

|
|
It's
hard not to be flippant about the renovator's nightmare that shelters
Mary, Joseph and the baby Jesus. They have obviously taken refuge in a
ruined house. But this house is a metaphor for the
world to which Jesus came, a moral shambles with not even one part of it
truly habitable. Into such a world was Jesus born. 
For
another painting of Mary and her son by Altdorfer, but this time with a very
different mood, see the thumbnail opposite.
|
|
Paul
Gauguin, Te Tamari No Atua
(Nativity), 1896
(both paintings)

|
|
Comment: The exalted mythic
creatures of medieval Nativity scenes have disappeared. Despite the
presence of the guarding angel, this is a real woman, cradling her baby
and lying exhausted after the birth. The fact that she is Polynesian
surprises a viewer accustomed to an Anglo-Saxon Mary, but reminds us
that Mary was neither: she was a Jewish peasant woman from the farming
province of Galilee.
Compare the
seated figure and the old woman in the top picture with the
figures in the lower painting; the old woman has become an
angel. Note also the animals and crib in the background of each
painting. |
|
Gerard
van Honthorst, 1622

|
|
Radiant light emanates from
the newborn child, illuminating everything around it - a symbol of
course of the message this baby will bring to the world. But Mary, do
cover him up please - it's winter, after all.
Can anyone tell me what the
device is in the bottom right hand corner?
|
|
The
Birth of Christ, Federico
Barocci, 1597

|
|
How sweet this painting is.
Mary, the new mother, is unable to drag her gaze away from the miracle
that is her baby; Joseph, the elated father, pulling visitors in to see
his child, surely the most wonderful thing in the universe; and the calm
ox and donkey, who look as if they have seen it all before.
Barocci used pastel colors
to great effect. His paintings were subtle, gentle, engaging. The
composition of this paintings is also interesting: the newborn baby is
at the far right, almost outside the picture, but everything directs our
eye towards it: Joseph's pointing hand, Mary's face and hands, the
animals' gaze.
|
|
The
Concert of Angels and the Nativity, Matthias
Grünewald,
1515

|
|
At
last, Mary in pink rather than blue.
Notice Mary's delighted smile
and the baby chortling up at her - also the cello-playing angel's pure
joy at the arrival of the Savior. This is homely grandeur at its best -
notice the potty and bath ready for this beloved baby. It is no accident
that
Grünewald included these items. He was reminding the viewer that Jesus
was both divine and human in the same body. |
|
Michael
Pacher, The St. Wolfgang Altarpiece, 1503

|
|
Pacher
was a wood-carver as well as a painter, and it shows. His figures have a
three-dimensional realism that other painters could only hope for.
When he was a young man he was deeply impressed with the work of the
Italian Andrea Mantegna, whose works are famous for their use of
perspective, foreshortening and depth. As well, Pacher used
intricate detail in those parts of the Altarpiece that are carved.
The thumbnail at right shows the St Wolfgang Altarpiece in all its
extravagant glory.
|
|
Marten
de Vos, 1577
|
|
It's an
ill wind that blows no good.
Many of the paintings in Antwerp churches were destroyed by Protestant
iconoclasts during the 'cleansing' of the Protestant Reformation - in
Antwerp, this was in 1566. When sanity returned, Marten de Vos was one
of the artists commissioned to make new paintings to replace the
destroyed and disfigured ones.
Notice the rich colors; the ruined buildings - not only a sign of Jesus'
humble circumstances, but symbol of a degraded civilization. See too the
distant shepherds cavorting as they wave to the angels above.
|
|
El Greco,
1603

|
|
The figures, while clearly mortal, as so ethereal they almost seem to
float. El Greco has spurned the traditional blue for Mary's robe, and
Joseph's figure is haloed by a golden cloak. These are no ordinary
parents, the artist says. The tiny baby, so vulnerable in its nakedness,
emanates light. El
Greco captured the essence of all great Spanish art: subtle
sensuality, sophistication, and unique emotional intensity.
|
The
Shepherds come
|
Domenico
Ghirlandaio, Adoration of the Shepherds, 1485

|
|
'Who are all these people?'
poor Joseph seems to be saying, as he gazes at the crowd coming down the
hill towards his little family.
Mary, like all of Ghirlandaio's women (see thumbnail at right), is serene,
untroubled, concentrating only on her little son, the center of her
universe. The baby is naked - which of course he would not have been in
real life. Jewish babies were swaddled in long strips of cloth to give
them a sense of security, akin to the constraint they had experienced in
the womb.
In
less skilful hands this might have been a 'busy' picture. Instead, it
teems with life and activity. Even the animals are alert, ears pricked,
focused on the Lord of Nature.
|
|
Giotto, Scrovegni Chapel, 1305

|
|
An unnamed woman passes the
newly-swaddled infant Jesus to his mother, who lies on a pallet after
giving birth. Joseph is waking up - according to medieval thinking, the
aged Joseph had not witnessed the miraculous birth of the baby. Angels
tumble over the roof of the open shed in which Mary lies. They are
watched by surprised shepherds.
The ox and the ass seems to have had the
best view of the whole event - being animals, they carried no sin, and
so were allowed to witness what happened in the stable.
Giotto has managed to
capture the tenderness and wonder of Mary as she surveys her new-born
son.
|
|
Piero
della Francesca, 1470

|
|
Mary kneels in ethereal
simplicity, adoring her tiny Son.
Flowers have sprung up in the ground around him. The choir of angels
play lutes, typical courtly instruments of the period - they seem suitably unaware
of the large, rather determined ox who tries to nudge them aside. The
realism of this creature is surprising, given that painters of this and
succeeding periods were not often happy in their drawing of
animals.
To the right we see Joseph with two shepherds - this threesome seem
altogether more vigorous than the other figures in the painting.
The background for the group is a broken-down stable with brick walls
and a plank roof on which the grass is sprouting. On the edge a bird has
perched.
In the background is a landscape showing the foothills of the
Apennines, and on the right a minute vista of the town, Borgo San
Sepolcro, where della Francesca was born in about 1416 - so he has given
him birthplace a touch of immortality in this painting.
Curious to think that this
painting was done just twenty years or so before Columbus set sail for
the Americas.
|
|
Antonio
Allegri, called Correggio, 1528

|
|
One suspects that Correggio
was not a deeply religious man. He was always at pains to show the human
face and form in its most pleasing manner, and his most successful work
was in the paintings he did of Greek mythology.
His Madonnas are very
human, albeit strikingly beautiful. The figures in his paintings almost
always have beautifully rounded limbs, perfect skin and charming
contours - an ideal derived from the artist's personal dislike of all
kinds of discord, either in life or art.
The treatment of the flesh
tones in this particular painting are typical of Correggio's style - he
was a master of chiaroscuro, the art of rendering light in shadow and
shadow in light. The flesh of Mary, the Babe, the shepherds and even the
ethereal angels glows as if alive and warm, with the tints so perfectly
fused that there is a soft roundness in even the masculine figures.
Correggio
gave this subject a fresh treatment in two ways:
The dark
space is illuminated by Jesus himself, who is the source of light. This
is both a theological idea and an artistic innovation - religious
paintings at that time were expected to be traditional in the way they
portrayed Jesus.
|
|
Adoration
of the Shepherds, Giorgione,1500

|
|
At first glance this
painting of the Adoration of the Shepherds seems rather unexciting. Mary
and a suitably aged Joseph gaze at the the newly born Jesus, and the two
shepherds bow before the tiny naked figure lying on the ground.
But what about the
landscape to the left of the painting? What is the significance of that
deep corridor of space that leads off into the distance? The setting
seems stronger, more arresting, than the subject itself. Are we meant to
think that Giorgione has painted the path humanity will take, into a
Christian future?
|
The
Three Wise Men
|
Altarpiece of the Virgin,
Jacques Darat,
1433
|
|
Contrast
this painting with the one above. It is an altarpiece, meant for
public display, and there is nothing homely about this Holy Family.
Mary's cloak is embroidered with gold thread; her skin has the delicate
bloom of a French noblewoman of the time. The stable appears to come
equipped with a plush red armchair for her to sit on. This is the
venerated Mary of the medieval Catholic church, second only to her Son.
|
|
Journey of the Magi,
James
Tissot,
1894

|
|
Comment: Tissot was not a
religious man, and strictly speaking this painting is really only an
excuse to show the grandeur of the highland country near
Jerusalem/Bethlehem, and the magnificent Arab kings as they travel in
search of Jesus.
|
|
Adoration of the
Magi, Leonardo
da Vinci, 1481

|
|
Critics and antiquarians
have spent many hours on this drawing/painting, attempting to work out
what parts of it were painted by da Vinci, and what parts were the work
of a later hand. No matter. The superb drawing and composition are
unmistakably da Vinci's.
The painting pulses with
energy. There is a sense of barely controlled chaos in the people,
animals and landscape - but at the center, holding it all together, is
the still, calm figure of Mary, and a chubby, unconcerned Baby Jesus.
|
|
Adoration
of the Magi, Gentile da
Fabriano,
1423
 |
|
The altarpiece
of the Adoration
of the Magi is Fabriano's most famous painting. Contrast its lavish
intricacy with Gauguin's painting of a Polynesian Mary (further up this page) and you will see the evolution of religious painting at a
glance. Which do you like better?
|
|
|
Pieter
Bruegel,
1564

|
|
True to form, there is not
too much physical beauty in Bruegel's painting of the Nativity. Even
here he will not idealize the scene.
One interesting point is the sleeve-length of the king in the left
foreground -- overlong to show extravagant use of rich material, and to
signal that the owner never has to do any sort of practical work -
though there is obviously some slit in the sleeve for the wearer's hand
to pass through. But kneeling before this tiny baby, the king has
discarded his scepter and crown. |
|
Adoration of the
Kings, Hendrik
ter Brugghen, 1619

|
|
The richly garbed kings are
full of gravity and reverence as they offer their gifts - Brugghen
suggests they knew very well how momentous is the birth of this little
child. And what a sweet child, grasping at the gift as any baby would.
|
|
Peter
Paul Rubens, 1634 
|
|
Ruben's Mary is no peasant
girl, but a sumptuously dressed queen holding her little prince. The
painting has the luscious colors Rubens was noted for - especially gold
and red, the colors of triumph - and this is a triumphal scene, with a
doctrinal message: Jesus is the Prince of Heaven, with kings as his
subjects. Fat little cherubs hover above. |
|
Return
to top
|